Counting once and calling it a baseline
A single inventory is a snapshot with nothing to compare against. The value arrives on the second run, which is why writing down the boundary and the method matters more than doing the first one perfectly.
Guides
Reading the area around you
How to find out what is really trading around you
The job. Building an honest picture of an area you are responsible for, or about to be.
Ask anyone who runs a place what is around them and you get a confident answer. Check it and you usually find it is a year or two behind: two units have changed hands, the category that felt dominant has thinned out, and something new opened at the far end that nobody has walked past.
This is not carelessness. Keeping a mental inventory current is genuinely hard, and the tools most teams have describe visits rather than occupants. Footfall counters say how many people came. Sales certificates cover only your own tenants. Neither says what is out there.
The good news is that a counted picture of an area is one of the more achievable things on this list. It is mostly patience.
The whole street, counted rather than remembered.
The method
Fix the boundary, and write it down
Decide exactly what you are counting and record the boundary somewhere it can be reused. The value of this exercise is almost entirely in repeating it later and comparing, and you cannot compare against a boundary you drew from memory the first time.
Build the inventory
Work category by category rather than street by street: it is far easier to notice that you have found only two of the six pharmacies you expected than to notice a missing unit on a street you have already walked. Record name, category, and address for everything inside the line.
Google Maps
Search by category term within the area, then verify each result.
What it misses. Start here for breadth. Expect duplicates, self-assigned categories that do not match what the unit actually does, and permanently closed listings that stay up for months.
OpenStreetMap
Community-maintained map data for the same area.
What it misses. Useful as a second opinion on what you found elsewhere. Coverage depends entirely on how active local mappers have been, so check it against one street you know before trusting any of it.
Establish vacancy properly
Vacancy is the number most often quoted and most often wrong, because a unit can be occupied on paper and dark in practice, or trading with no online presence at all. Combine a records check with a walk, and record the date you walked.
The business rates valuation list
Search an address on the government's business rates valuation service.
What it misses. Public, free, and useful for what a unit is, its rateable value and often its floor area. It reflects the rating record, not whether the shutter went up this morning.
The council's planning portal
Search recent applications inside your boundary, especially change of use.
What it misses. The earliest public sign of what a unit is about to become. Search interfaces vary from good to hostile depending on the council.
A dated walk
Photograph every frontage, once, with the date.
What it misses. Settles every disagreement the records create, and gives you a baseline for the next run.
Get a read on how they are doing
You will not get turnover for businesses that are not your tenants. You can get proxies, and used carefully they are informative: the rating distribution across a category, how many reviews a place has collected recently compared with a year ago, and whether the written reviews have changed subject.
Review volume over time
On each listing, compare the flow of recent reviews with the older ones.
What it misses. A reasonable proxy for trade direction across many places. Useless for any single place, because a review push or a viral moment moves it.
Popular times
Shown on many Google listings.
What it misses. Indicative of when a place is busy, not how busy. Fine for comparing a place with itself across the week; do not compare it between businesses.
Companies House
Look up the operating company behind an independent.
What it misses. Incorporation dates, charges and the shape of the accounts. Small companies file abbreviated accounts, so expect little detail.
Do the same for one comparison area
A single area's numbers mean very little on their own. Is eleven coffee shops a lot? Only compared with something. Pick an area your visitors could plausibly have gone to instead, run the identical process, and put the two category shares side by side. This one step turns a description into a finding, and it is the step most often skipped because it doubles the work.
Where this goes wrong
Letting the category labels do the thinking
Online categories are self-assigned and often wrong. A cafe that is really a bakery, a hairdresser filed as a beauty salon. Fix the categories against what you saw on the walk before you count anything, or your mix analysis is measuring how operators describe themselves.
Ignoring the places without a digital footprint
Long-standing independents can have almost no online presence and still be the busiest unit on the street. Any method built only on online sources will undercount exactly the operators who define the character of a place.
Or have it run for you
Everything above is doable by hand for one area. The difficulty is doing it for several, keeping them comparable, and doing it again next quarter.
Draw the boundary and every place inside it is collected, with category, rating and review counts, in one pass.
The reviews themselves are read, so the recurring strengths and pain points across the area come back as themes rather than as a score.
The comparison area is a first-class part of the analysis rather than a second afternoon's work.
The boundary and the method are stored, so the next run is genuinely comparable with this one.
What is actually here, and what do people say about it?
Area Analysis
Everything trading inside your boundary, the category mix, the rating distribution, and the strengths and pain points that recur across the operators in it.
How does this area read against a comparable one?
Gap Analysis
Your area against up to three others on mix, performance, customer voice, pricing and momentum, ending on a ranked list of gaps with the evidence behind each.
Draw your area and see it
Sign up free. The first area is on us, and it takes a couple of minutes to set up.
Get started free